Bridging The Cannabis Banking Divide: CRB And FI Perspectives

The US Supreme Court recently issued a decision in the SEC v. Jarkesy case (Jarkesy Case), which could have significant implications for the cryptocurrency industry. While the Jarkesy case doesn't directly involve cryptocurrencies, the Court’s ruling may substantially impair the SEC's ability to regulate cryptocurrencies. Briefly, the SEC began investigating Jarkesy and Patriot28 for securities fraud and misleading investors. Between 2007 and 2010, Jarkesy launched two investment funds, raising about $24 million from 120 “accredited” investors. [i] The SEC initiated an enforcement action, contending that Jarkesy violated the antifraud provisions of the Securities Act of 1933 [ii] , the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 [iii] , and the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 [iv] , and sought civil penalties and other remedies. Supreme Court Ruling In the Jarkesy case, the Court decided a single issue: “Whether the Security and Exchange Commission’s use of in-house hearings to seek civil penalties violates the Seventh Amendment right to a jury trial.” [v] The Supreme Court limited the SEC’s ability to use in-house tribunals when seeking civil penalties against companies and individuals accused of securities fraud. The Court held in SEC v. Jarkesy that the Seventh Amendment entitles a defendant to a jury trial in such circumstances and that the SEC cannot force a defendant into internal administrative proceedings, which are held in front of Administrative Law Judges (ALJs) instead of in federal court. [vi] Here's a breakdown of the potential impacts: Reduced SEC Enforcement Power According to the Cornerstone Research - SEC Cryptocurrency Enforcement: 2023 Update (the report), in 2023, the SEC brought 46 enforcement actions against various digital-asset market participants. This number is the highest since 2013 and a 53% increase from 2022. [vii] The report found that of the 46 enforcement actions, the SEC brought 26 litigations in U.S. federal courts and 20 administrative proceedings in 2023. The 20 administrative proceedings were more than triple the administrative proceedings from last year. Also, the SEC imposed $281 million in monetary penalties for settlements reached in 2023. [viii] The ruling in the Jarkesy case requires the SEC to bring enforcement actions in federal court with a right to a jury trial. Jury trails in federal court could slow down the SEC's enforcement process and potentially weaken its deterrent effect. The Jarkesy case challenges the SEC's discretion to choose between administrative proceedings and federal court for enforcement actions. Thus, as stated above, while the SEC administrative proceedings tripled between 2022 and 2023, the administrative proceedings will probably decrease the rest of 2024 and for the foreseeable future. Increased Uncertainty for the Crypto Industry The restriction on the SEC to levy civil penalties, could lead to increased regulatory ambiguity for cryptocurrencies. Crypto companies might find themselves entangled in more legal disputes on the federal level where litigation is more complicated and more expensive. Some crypto companies might face challenges, while others with stronger legal teams and financial resources could benefit from a less stringent regulatory environment. Investor Confidence Ambiguous regulations and regulatory enforcement may create uncertainty, making investors hesitant to risk their capital. This regulatory uncertainty could have an adverse impact on cryptocurrency prices and the overall cryptocurrency market. Combating Fraud and Abuse Clear regulations can help combat fraud, money laundering, and other illicit activities. By establishing reporting requirements and compliance standards, regulators can deter bad actors and protect consumers. In fact, that is what the SEC was doing when they investigated Jarkesy, investigating the possibility that Jarkesy was engaged in securities fraud and misleading investors. Summary The impact of the SEC v. Jarkesy ruling has not received a major response from the cryptocurrency community. That is most likely because SEC v. Jarkesy was not a cryptocurrency case; nevertheless, this case will have a major impact on the SEC’s enforcement of cryptocurrency companies which may require them to work with their attorneys to conduct a more thorough legal cost/benefit analysis if the SEC comes knocking at their door.  What are your thoughts? Please leave your comments below.